Преюдиція у праві: до визначення сутності та змісту
Institutional Repository of Zhytomyr National Agroecological Universit
View Archive Info| Field | Value | |
| Title |
Преюдиція у праві: до визначення сутності та змісту
|
|
| Creator |
Ляшенко, Р. Д.
Буряченко, А. М. Lyashenko, R. Buryachenko, A. |
|
| Subject |
преюдиція
законодавство преюдиційні факти судова практика prejudice prejudicial fact legislation jurisdiction преюдиция законодательство преюдицийни факты судебная практика |
|
| Description |
У статті визначено поняття категорії «преюдиція», з’ясовується її природа та місце у вітчизняному законодавстві. Аналізуються особливості застосування преюдиції на практиці. У висновках пропонуються рекомендації щодо удосконалення законодавчих положень, що розкривають зміст та особливості застосування преюдиції.
In article the concept of a category «prejudice» is defined, its nature and a place in the domestic legislation is found out. Prejudice as the concept first emerged in Roman law. The term «prejudice» comes from the Latin word «praejudicium» means a pre-decision, circumstance which entitles to think about the consequences. The concept of «praejudice» contains the following features as legitimacy, commitment, accuracy, previous conclusion, objectivity. One of legal categories who provides stability and authority of acts the justices is prejudice. After summarizing existing research literature approaches to understanding prejudice, we note that in the literature the term «prejudice» has a different semantic definition: as an act of enforcement, as the facts established by the court, as a result of inheritance of one another court, as intellectual and volitional activities proof, as a property of certain legal phenomena, as a method of legal technology. Prejudice this – taking legal technique that is proving the rule that law enforcement decisions Authority, which came into force acceptable fifth in accordance with the law of the presence or absence of a legal fact mandatory for all law enforcement who are considering legal work related to previously unsolved affair just with the that fact. In domestic law definition of prejudice is not fixed, but in jurisprudence, it is widely used. This leads to some difficulties in the use of the mechanism preclusion in solving cases, because the existing legislation does not explicitly regulate the application of prejudice. In domestic criminal procedure and civil procedural theory there is no unanimity on the issues that characterize the legal nature prejudice judgments, their grounds and limits of action. As a result of lack of legal regulation and no special theoretical development of these issues there are difficulties associated with determining the capabilities and limits the use of mandatory earlier judgments. In practice, from time to time there are situations when a judge put the concept of «prejudice» different content. In one case, the judge accepts the facts contained in the judgment, in fact, as prejudicial, but otherwise the same – only the legal position as fellow judges. The origins of this problem lies in the lack of clear guidance in the law on which the judgment of the facts should be considered prejudicial. It is noted that the category of «prejudice» provides stability and authority of acts of justice, promotes fair and accessible justice system that would meet international legal standards and amendments to the legislation will lead to more effective use of the category «prejudice» in the proceedings and the adoption of legal and fair and reasonable judgments. It is concluded that the final settlement institute prejudice be agreed legal rules governing prejudice in various areas of law, specific guidelines for the use of the institute of prejudice based on generalized typical facts. В статье определено понятие категории «преюдиция», выясняется ее природа и место в отечественном законодательстве. Анализируются особенности применения преюдиции на практике. В выводах предлагаются рекомендации по совершенствованию законодательных положений, раскрывающих содержание и особенности применения преюдиции. |
|
| Date |
2016-05-27T10:12:09Z
2016-05-27T10:12:09Z 2013 |
|
| Type |
Article
|
|
| Identifier |
Ляшенко Р. Д. Преюдиція у праві: до визначення сутності та змісту / Р. Д. Ляшенко, А. М. Буряченко // Вісн. Запорізького нац. ун-ту. Сер. Юрид. науки. − 2013. − № 2 (1). − С. 11−16.
http://ir.znau.edu.ua/handle/123456789/4323 |
|
| Language |
uk
|
|
| Publisher |
Запорізький національний університет
|
|